Foundations Unit F6
Ratios, Rates & Proportions
Compare quantities, find unit rates, and solve proportions by cross-multiplying.
What a ratio, rate, and unit rate are; scaling and simplifying equivalent ratios; the hidden whole that turns part-to-part into part-to-whole fractions; dividing to a unit rate; and solving proportions by cross-multiplication — the workhorse of nearly every rate word problem.
Builds on: F5 · Percentages
Two pitchers of lemonade
You mix one pitcher with cups of lemon juice and of water. A friend mixes theirs with cups of juice and of water. Which one tastes more lemony? The gaps don’t help — one pitcher has “one more water than juice,” the other “two more” — because taste doesn’t care about gaps. It cares about proportion: how much juice there is for each unit of water. Questions shaped like that — mixing, pricing, speed, scaling a recipe — are what this unit is for. In F5 you compared everything against a standard base of ; a ratio drops the standard base and compares any two quantities directly against each other.
Ratio, rate, unit rate
Three cups of flour to two cups of sugar is the ratio 3 : 2 — which is also just the fraction from F3, “one and a half cups of flour for each cup of sugar.” When the two quantities carry different units it’s called a rate — miles per hours — and a rate shrunk down to “per 1” is a unit rate: miles per hour. One family of ideas, and one tool at the end — the proportion — that solves nearly every word problem built from them.
Equivalent ratios — scale both parts together
Double the recipe: flour, sugar. Nothing about the taste changed, because both parts grew by the same factor — 6 : 4 is the same ratio as 3 : 2, exactly the way and are the same fraction. Scaling both parts by any number keeps a ratio; dividing both by their GCF simplifies it to lowest terms.
Here is where the oldest instinct in arithmetic quietly sabotages people: adding the same amount to both parts feels just as safe as multiplying — after all, it keeps the gap identical. But watch the taste: go from to (one more cup of each) and the juice climbs from of the pitcher to — from to about , noticeably stronger. Equal gaps are not equal proportions; ratios live in multiplication, not addition. That’s also the answer to the two pitchers: rename both to fifteenths of a batch — against — and the first pitcher is the lemony one.
The widget opens on 6 : 4 — predict its simplest form, then scan the equivalent rows. Then enter 2 : 3 and look for 10 : 15 in its family; 3 : 5 will never produce it.
The hidden whole: part-to-part vs part-to-whole
A ratio of 3 : 2 secretly involves a total of parts. So out of every are the first kind () and out of the second (). Miss that hidden whole and the fraction bar habit lays a trap: a class with boys : girls sounds like ” of the class is boys,” but of a class is more students than the class has. The and the are both parts; the whole they share is . Spotting it is what turns a ratio problem into a fraction or percent problem: of the students are boys — and every F5 tool applies.
Unit rate: how much “per one”
Now the shopping version of the lemonade question: pens for $, or pens for $ — which is the better deal? Neither raw pair is comparable, so shrink both to “per one pen”: dollars per pen against . The bigger pack wins, by seven cents a pen. That’s all a unit rate is: division used to make any two deals, speeds, or mixtures comparable on a common footing — and once you have “per one,” any amount is a single multiplication away.
The widget opens on the $-for- deal. Enter the rival ( and ) and compare the per-one values yourself. Then try and — the same division turns a road trip into miles per hour.
Proportions: the same ratio, twice
“If pens cost $, how much do pens cost?” The price per pen doesn’t change, so the two situations form the same ratio — written twice, with one number missing:
That’s a proportion. When the numbers are friendly, solve it by pure scaling: pens went , a factor of , so dollars go . When the scaling factor is ugly, cross-multiplication is the all-terrain tool: in any true proportion , the diagonals match — — so becomes , and . (The Cheat Sheet shows the one-line algebra behind why the diagonals must agree.)
The solver opens on — predict by scaling ( is ) before reading its steps. Then move the empty box to a bottom position and watch the same diagonal rule handle it.
The reliable setup for word problems
Everything above assumed the ratios were written consistently — and that first move is where proportions actually go wrong. Line the same units up: top-and-top, bottom-and-bottom. Pens over dollars on the left means pens over dollars on the right, never dollars over pens. The cross-multiplication is indifferent — it will happily grind a flipped setup into a confident wrong answer — so spend your care on the setup, not the arithmetic.
The one thing to remember
Ratios compare by multiplication, never by gaps — scaling both parts keeps a ratio, adding to both parts quietly changes it. Divide to “per one” and anything becomes comparable; and when the same ratio shows up twice with a blank, line the units up and let the diagonals find it.
What they mean
A ratio compares two quantities: 3 : 2 (also written ). A rate is a ratio of different units, like miles per hours. A unit rate shrinks it to “per 1”: miles per hour.
The three skills
| Skill | How | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Simplify / equivalent | Multiply or divide both parts by the same number. | 6 : 4 = 3 : 2 = 9 : 6 |
| Unit rate | Divide to get “per 1”. | $ for pens → $ per pen |
| Solve a proportion | Cross-multiply, then divide. |
The hidden whole
A part-to-part ratio names a whole you can use. 3 : 2 means parts in all, so and of the whole — the bridge from ratios to fractions and percents ().
The reliable setup for word problems
Line the same units up top-and-top, bottom-and-bottom. “If pens cost $, how much do pens cost?” → pens / dollars: , then cross-multiply.